Played March 14th. This course, along with its sister course The Legends, is one of those courses you can always go to and never be dissipointed. The staff was friendly and the conditions for this time of year were great.

Played March 15th. The only reason I gave the greens a 6, is that they were just punched a week ago otherwise they would have been a 10. That said, they were still fun and challanging. Great course with beautiful views and the best sand and fairways that I played this year.

Played on Saturday March 12th. The course has been flooded for some time and there are still many areas of the fairways under water. The management has miss marked these wet areas in the fairways as "Water Hazards", when this should be casual water and given a free drop. Many of these areas can not be seen when hitting your drive, so after hitting what you thought was a great drive, you are being penalized a shot and loosing a golf ball. I understand that the course has taken a beating and it is in great shape for what it has been through. My problem is the gross mis-management of this course. Tee times are 7 minutes apart and they pack on three tournaments prior to 11:00am. When we arrived on hole #4 (temporary layout)a par three on the front side, we were already 2 hours into our round and 5 groups were on the tee. If you don't believe me a have the picture.

This could be a very nice place to play if managed properly but with our experience, they wern't interested.

This was the last of 8 courses we played in 5 days. The "Ike" must get more play than the "Babe", I don't know why because the "Babe is a quality course. The pace of play was a little slow at a little over 5 hours. The greens were a bit bumpy and had some ball mark damage. The fairways and tee boxes were in good shape and overall I enjoyed the re-design, the coures was much more fair.

The last time we played the "Babe" was in 2005. The course seemed to be neglected compared to the "Ike" but times have changed. The "Babe" was in better condition the the "Ike". The fairways were perfect, greens rolled smoth and true and the new layout was quite enjoyable. Nice work!

Very nice layout, Would come back in a heartbeat. The staff was great! The Day we played the greens had been punched on one half. For the most part it didn't effect play and the greens didn't show any excessive wear on the un-punched side.

Great layout, sever greens. The day we played, there was a PGA event, so the pins were 3-4 paces on the green tucked in the corners. Some of the greens looked like there we elephants burried under them, in some cases the whole family must have been under there. The sand for me, was too soft and made for difficult sand shots, but overall a great course. The staff was outstanding!

Very nice course with slick greens. Tee shots are in some cases severe, narrow and forced carries. Overall a great course, we will be back.

What a great course, well worth the green fee. The greens were lightning fast and smooth and held well. They putted consistantly, speed wise from green to green. As an out of state visitor, this will make my list of great courses to come back to.

The course was in good shape, even for the dry winter season. The fairways had some real soft over-watered spots, and round was extremely slow (six hours) most likely we won't be back. The group in front of us was a five-some, which included the Club Pro.

Played 02/24/2005: The course was very wet but in great shape. The greens were very puttable and the speed was true from green to green. Customer service staff was excelent!

Played 02/23/2005: The Coures had rivers of water flowing down some fairways, but the course still played very well. The greens however, were a different story. The proshop said that the greens were putting between 12 & 13 on the stempmeter. Now keep in mind the Pros were putting on greens at LaCosta that were running 10-11. I don't mind putting on fast greens, but this is just too fast for the average golfer. OK for Q-School, but not if you want golfers to enjoy their round.